BMR and TDEE Explained: How Calorie Calculators Estimate Your Needs

The Mifflin-St Jeor equation worked by hand, what the 1.2 to 1.9 activity factors mean, how accurate the estimate is, and how to correct it with your own data.

· 6 min read

Screenshot of RedBison's Calorie Calculator running in the browser

Type the same height, weight and age into five online calorie calculators and you can get five answers spread over 400 kcal. Most of that spread does not come from the maths of metabolism. It comes from one dropdown: activity level. Understanding what each part of the estimate does, and which part is shaky, is the difference between a target that works and one that quietly stalls.

This guide walks through basal metabolic rate (BMR), total daily energy expenditure (TDEE), the Mifflin-St Jeor equation used by the Calorie Calculator, and how to correct the estimate with your own weight data. It is general information, not medical or dietetic advice.

What your daily energy goes on

Your total daily energy expenditure has four parts:

ComponentTypical shareWhat it is
Basal or resting metabolism60 to 70%Keeping organs, brain and body temperature running at rest
Thermic effect of foodabout 10%Energy spent digesting and storing what you eat
Exercise0 to 15% for most peoplePlanned training
Non-exercise activity (NEAT)15 to 30%Walking, standing, fidgeting, chores, a physical job

The surprise for most people is how small exercise usually is next to NEAT. An hour in the gym burns a few hundred kcal; the difference between a desk worker and a nurse who walks 15,000 steps a shift can be larger, every day.

TDEE built up as BMR multiplied by an activity factor, with the five factors from 1.2 to 1.9 shown as bars
TDEE built up as BMR multiplied by an activity factor, with the five factors from 1.2 to 1.9 shown as bars

The Mifflin-St Jeor equation

You cannot measure BMR at home; it takes indirect calorimetry in a lab. So calculators predict it from body size, age and sex. The equation most of them use was published in 1990 by Mark Mifflin, Sachiko St Jeor and colleagues, from measurements of 498 healthy adults:

Men:    BMR = 10 × weight (kg) + 6.25 × height (cm) − 5 × age (years) + 5
Women:  BMR = 10 × weight (kg) + 6.25 × height (cm) − 5 × age (years) − 161

The only difference between the sexes is the constant, a gap of 166 kcal a day. Every extra kilogram adds 10 kcal, every centimetre 6.25, and every year of age removes 5.

In 2005 a systematic review by Frankenfield and colleagues for the American Dietetic Association compared the common prediction equations against measured resting metabolism. Mifflin-St Jeor came out as the most likely to land within 10% of the measured value in both non-obese and obese adults, ahead of the older Harris-Benedict equation (1919). That is why it became the default.

"Within 10%" is the honest accuracy statement. For someone whose true BMR is 1,600 kcal, the equation could say anywhere from about 1,440 to 1,760 and still count as accurate.

From BMR to TDEE: the activity factor

TDEE is estimated by multiplying BMR by an activity factor. The Calorie Calculator uses the standard five:

Level in the toolFactorDescription
Sedentary1.2Desk job, little or no exercise
Light1.375Light exercise 1 to 3 days a week
Moderate1.55Moderate exercise 3 to 5 days a week
High1.725Hard exercise 6 to 7 days a week
Very High1.9Very intense training or a physical job

Going from Light to Moderate adds 12.7% to the estimate. For a BMR of 1,650 that is about 290 kcal a day, which is roughly the size of a modest deficit. Pick the wrong level and your "deficit" may be maintenance.

People reliably overestimate their activity. The descriptions are about exercise, but the factor has to cover all 168 hours of the week. Someone who trains hard for 45 minutes four times a week and sits the rest of the day is usually better described by Light than Moderate. When unsure, choose the lower level and correct upward with data.

A worked example

A 30-year-old man, 70 kg, 175 cm, who trains three or four times a week:

BMR  = 10 × 70 + 6.25 × 175 − 5 × 30 + 5
     = 700 + 1,093.75 − 150 + 5
     = 1,648.75 kcal  (shown as 1,649)

TDEE = 1,648.75 × 1.55 (Moderate)
     = 2,555.6 kcal   (shown as 2,556)

With Maintain Current Weight selected, the calculator splits 2,556 kcal into 25% protein, 50% carbohydrate and 25% fat. At 4, 4 and 9 kcal per gram that is 160 g protein, 319 g carbs and 71 g fat. Choosing Moderate Weight Loss subtracts 500 kcal for a target of 2,056; Slow Weight Loss subtracts 250, and Lean Muscle Gain adds 200.

Now the same man picks Light instead: 1,648.75 × 1.375 = 2,267 kcal. That 289 kcal gap is why two calculators disagree, and why the next section matters more than the equation.

Worked Mifflin-St Jeor example for a 30-year-old man of 70 kg and 175 cm, ending at a TDEE of 2,556 kcal
Worked Mifflin-St Jeor example for a 30-year-old man of 70 kg and 175 cm, ending at a TDEE of 2,556 kcal

Correcting the estimate with your own data

The formula gives you a starting point. Your scale gives you the answer. A simple method:

  1. Eat at the estimated TDEE as consistently as you can for two to three weeks, logging intake.
  2. Weigh yourself each morning under the same conditions and take the weekly average.
  3. If the average is stable, your intake is your real TDEE. If it is falling or rising, adjust.

Roughly, a steady change of 0.5 kg a week means you are about 550 kcal a day away from maintenance (0.5 × 7,700 / 7). Move intake by 100 to 200 kcal at a time and watch another two weeks. Ignore the first week of any new diet: changes in water, salt and glycogen can move the scale 1 to 2 kg on their own.

Common mistakes

  • Adding exercise calories on top. If your activity level already includes training, adding a watch's estimate counts the same work twice. Wearables also tend to overestimate burn.
  • Never recalculating. BMR drops by about 50 kcal for every 5 kg lost (10 kcal per kg), plus the activity factor on top. Rerun the numbers after each 4 to 5 kg change.
  • Trusting it for very lean or very muscular people. The equation was built on ordinary adults. Bodybuilders are often underestimated; people with high body fat can be overestimated.
  • Using it for children, pregnancy or illness. Needs differ, and these situations call for professional advice.
  • Treating the macro split as personal. The 25/50/25 split is generic. If you train, set protein from body weight with the Protein Calculator first.

Putting it to work

Use the calculator to get a first number, pick the more conservative activity level, and eat at that number for two weeks before changing anything. If weight loss is the goal, the Calorie Deficit Planner turns that TDEE into a dated plan, and the calorie deficit guide explains why the plan will run slower than the arithmetic says. Fluid needs rise with activity too; the hydration guide covers that side.

Open the Calorie Calculator